Saturday, September 5, 2009

H1N1


It’s the flu. There, I’ve just summarized all the horrors of swine flu. It is just the flu.


What is unique about it? It’s off season so it is a little weird I’ll give it that.


But people have died! People die every year from the flu and it is almost always, and the same goes here as well, when they have underlying health problems.


But more people have died. Because it’s off season and there’s no vaccinations. duhhhhh


I finally shout this out because I’m sick of all this H1N1 hullabaloo and today was the last straw. We find this new strain of the flu that rises up off season and all of a sudden it’s the Bubonic plague. A pandemic they’re calling it. Ask any doctor and they will tell you that while you should get vaccinated (because they always tell you that) it is essentially no less or more deadly than the flu because that’s what it is. Every year we get a new strand and this is no different.

But it makes for such good news material! First it was Swine Flu, then Pandemic, now it’s H1N1 Virus because the official name sounds really scary and not like it’s just the flu. Call it whatever you want, the Godzilla Flu if you may, it won’t change anything. Yet when I was in NY I must have read about at least 5 schools shutting down because a few students got sick. They don’t do that w/ the flu because that would be ridiculous. But w/ H1N1, oh boy don’t mess.

I finally vent about this because of what I saw on the news this morning. In MA they are trying to get a bill passed that would allow way to much power to the Gov-t. Basically in the event that the governor declares a state of emergency, people will still retain the right to refuse vaccinations, but the state will have the authority to forcefully enter houses and detain and quarantine those who are sick and deemed health threats. Those who refuse to comply can actually be fined and put in jail.

Now I read the bill (S. 2028) and I believe it’s preposterous. Who gets to decide who’s a ‘health threat’ and who isn’t? A politician? All this for the flu? This is the most absurd thing ever. What a poor excuse for absolute idiocy. At least it is being done in a legal and democratic way; as in it is being passed through the state senate (it got a unanimous vote!) and w/ enough resistance can be shot down. What scares me is that this come at a time when the Obama administration is trying to pass their healthcare bill which has already shoed in some shady stuff (like the ability to peer into private IRS tax records. What does that have to do w/ healthcare?). What if in the name of the ‘H1N1 Pandemic’ the Federal Gov-t decided to adopt the same practice? Do you know what that would mean? They could turn this whole silly Swine Flu hysteria into a means to have absolute control on society.

I’m sick of this flu business (no pun intended).

4 comments:

  1. :) Ever saw the movie 'I am legend'? We wouldn't want it to go that far, so better safe than sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes I saw that movie, as well as 'Outbreak', '28 Days Later...' but that's all Hollywood. If something serious like that happened we would all take necessary measures to protect ourselves w/out being told to. A bill like this would allow the Gov-t to declare anyone a health threat and then proceed to do whatever it wants.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm with staples about the ''seriousness'' of this flu, i think it is but an attempt to spread panic and to steer the attention of the populous into another direction (who is demonstrating against war if they might die any minute now)
    Now i know politics the same way a 5 year old knows quantum mechanics, but the issue of ''why do they have a right to decide who is...'' is discussed in philosophy a lot. Sometimes using the example of ''why do they (psychologists) right to decide who is clinically crazy or suicidal?''. Political philosophers in the seventeenth and eighteenth century such as; Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were of the opinion that the reason people organized themselves into sovereign states is because of man's insecurity in living in the rough-and-tumble of the state of nature, alone (lawlessness, two way traffic collisions, noisy neighbors and wife stealing) So in short: limits on individual freedoms are accepted as fair exchange for the benefit of the state.
    On the other side we have Niccolo Machiavelli, author of ''The Prince'': might equals right, i.e whoever is on the throne can do as he pleases because he is king.

    Nice post, i like the points you are making and the humor is pleasant and refreshing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well I am definitely on the side of minimal Gov-t. Rousseau was one of Carl Marx's role models after all.

    One thing to think about; How much money is made each year from vaccinations? How much MORE money will be made from Swine Flu?

    ReplyDelete